Two-Step Challenge

    Category

    Prop Trading & Funded Accounts

    Sub-category

    Prop-Firm-Modelle

    Curated by

    GlanWick Team

    Last reviewed

    · Methodology

    A two-step challenge is the most common evaluation model used by prop firms. Traders must reach defined profit targets in two consecutive phases – typically 8 % in phase 1 and 5 % in phase 2 – without breaching the daily loss limit or the overall loss limit. Passing both phases unlocks a funded account with a profit split.

    Context & Mechanics

    Structure of the two phases

    The two-step challenge is the standard path to a funded account at a prop firm. Phase 1 requires a higher profit target, historically 8–10 % of the nominal account balance. Phase 2 serves as a consistency check with a lower target, usually 4–5 %. The same loss limits apply in both phases: a daily loss limit of typically 4–5 % and an overall loss limit of typically 8–10 %. Many providers also require minimum trading days (e.g. 4–5 per phase); time limits have been dropped by many providers in recent years.

    How it differs from other models

    A one-step challenge drops phase 2 – but its rules, often a trailing drawdown, tend to be stricter. With instant funding the trader starts without an evaluation but under tighter limits and a lower profit split. The two-step challenge sits in between: more testing effort, but historically milder rules in the funded account.

    The economics of the challenge

    Participation costs a fee that scales with account size (often €100–700). A failed attempt requires a new fee or a paid reset. Historically only a minority of participants passes both phases – fees from failed attempts are a core revenue source for many providers. Some prop firms refund the fee with the first payout.

    Why participants fail

    The most common reason is not the profit target but breaching the loss limits – often through oversized positions close to the target or after a losing streak. A rule breach ends the challenge immediately, regardless of interim progress. Practising a provider's exact parameters under realistic conditions reduces paid failed attempts: the GlanWick simulator replicates two-step conditions with profit targets and loss limits risk-free – GlanWick is a training and simulation tool and not a prop firm itself.

    Execution Example

    A trader pays €500 for a two-step challenge on a nominal $100,000 account (phase 1: +8 %, phase 2: +5 %, daily loss limit 5 %, overall loss limit 10 %, minimum 4 trading days per phase).

    1. Phase 1: the trader reaches +$8,000 in 12 trading days; largest daily loss −$2,100, total drawdown never above 4 % → passed.
    2. Phase 2: target +$5,000 under identical limits; reached after 9 trading days → passed.
    3. The $100,000 funded account is activated; with this provider the €500 fee is refunded with the first payout.
    4. Alternative scenario: a daily loss of −$5,300 in phase 2 would have ended the challenge immediately – a new attempt requires paying again or a reset.

    Execution Risk & Errors

    1

    Increasing position size just before the profit target and breaching the daily loss limit

    2

    Approaching phase 2 at the same pace as phase 1 although the target is lower

    3

    Overlooking minimum trading days and declaring the account “done” too early

    4

    Not knowing the provider's exact limits (balance vs. equity basis)

    5

    Failing to budget reset costs as recurring costs

    Frequently Asked

    How long does a two-step challenge take?

    Many providers have removed time limits. In practice both phases together often take several weeks; only minimum trading days (e.g. 4–5 per phase) are usually required.

    How does it differ from a one-step challenge?

    A one-step challenge has only one phase but often stricter rules such as a trailing drawdown. The two-step challenge tests longer but historically offers milder funded-account conditions.

    How many traders pass a two-step challenge?

    Historically only a minority passes both phases. The most common reason for failure is breaching loss limits, not missing the profit target.

    Can I simulate a two-step challenge in advance?

    Yes. The GlanWick simulator replicates profit targets, daily loss limit and overall loss limit of a two-step challenge risk-free.

    This Website Uses Cookies

    We use technically required cookies so the platform works. Optional cookies are only set with your explicit consent.

    Legal basis: Art. 6(1)(a) GDPR. You can withdraw your consent at any time via the "Cookie Settings" link in the footer.

    More information in our Privacy Policy · Imprint